job candidate says she would wish to work for us secretly
A reader writes:
We interviewed a candidate for a part-time place who had been out of our line of labor for 10 years. I interviewed her as a result of she had another issues on her resume that appeared actually fascinating (from a enterprise she’s been working with a member of the family). Nonetheless, we’re a quickly-changing business and it’s uncommon to grant an interview to somebody who isn’t up on the newest developments. So I believed she could be completely satisfied once we determined to test references and almost certainly supply her the job.
Nonetheless, she advised us she couldn’t present any work-related references — none in any respect — as a result of (a) those from our business had been too outdated; and (b) it was vital that no one she offers with through her present enterprise is aware of she could be additionally working for us, as they needed to be below the impression that she is at her on-line job and accessible to them always. She supplied us two private references, each shut pals. We requested once more for anyone who may communicate to her work ethic, attitudes, demeanor, and many others. (a vendor, for instance, if she’d somewhat not have prospects know). She once more refused. So we moved on with one other candidate.
The opposite candidate is nice, however I can’t assist however surprise how the primary particular person thought this may work if she did get the job. Is it regular for people who find themselves working small companies and have a aspect job to keep up this type of secrecy between their two jobs? She didn’t even identify her enterprise on her resume — simply put “household enterprise” and talked about the important thing components of it. I found out what it was as I’m within the matter her on-line platform covers. They’ve a stable platform, however she’s not working Microsoft. Why the secrecy? Would individuals she offers with for her on-line enterprise care if she had a job with us a couple of days every week? How may it presumably be damaging?
The perfect clarification I’ve provide you with is that she is embarrassed that the enterprise is just not as worthwhile as she would love, which I assume is why she interviewed with us. However that’s such a standard factor in household companies, it’s arduous for me to see the way it might be vital sufficient for her to lose a job over. What’s your take?
I reply this query over at Inc. in the present day, the place I’m revisiting letters which were buried within the archives right here from years in the past (and generally updating/increasing my solutions to them). You can learn it right here.