job candidate says she would wish to work for us secretly
A reader writes:
We interviewed a candidate for a part-time place who had been out of our line of labor for 10 years. I interviewed her as a result of she had another issues on her resume that appeared actually attention-grabbing (from a enterprise she’s been working with a member of the family). Nonetheless, we’re a quickly-changing business and it’s uncommon to grant an interview to somebody who isn’t up on the newest developments. So I believed she can be joyful once we determined to verify references and probably provide her the job.
Nonetheless, she advised us she couldn’t present any work-related references — none in any respect — as a result of (a) those from our business had been too outdated; and (b) it was essential that no one she offers with by way of her present enterprise is aware of she can be additionally working for us, as they needed to be below the impression that she is at her on-line job and accessible to them always. She provided us two private references, each shut associates. We requested once more for anyone who might converse to her work ethic, attitudes, demeanor, and so on. (a vendor, for instance, if she’d reasonably not have clients know). She once more refused. So we moved on with one other candidate.
The opposite candidate is nice, however I can’t assist however marvel how the primary individual thought this might work if she did get the job. Is it regular for people who find themselves working small companies and have a aspect job to keep up this sort of secrecy between their two jobs? She didn’t even title her enterprise on her resume — simply put “household enterprise” and talked about the important thing components of it. I discovered what it was as I’m within the matter her on-line platform covers. They’ve a stable platform, however she’s not working Microsoft. Why the secrecy? Would individuals she offers with for her on-line enterprise care if she had a job with us just a few days every week? How might it probably be damaging?
The very best rationalization I’ve provide you with is that she is embarrassed that the enterprise shouldn’t be as worthwhile as she would love, which I assume is why she interviewed with us. However that’s such a traditional factor in household companies, it’s onerous for me to see the way it may very well be essential sufficient for her to lose a job over. What’s your take?
I reply this query over at Inc. right now, the place I’m revisiting letters which were buried within the archives right here from years in the past (and typically updating/increasing my solutions to them). You can learn it right here.